Showing posts with label Rationalization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rationalization. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 8, 2017

Parading Lies As Truth

Wednesday, November 8, 2017
Some Pharisees and teachers of religious law now arrived from Jerusalem to see Jesus.  They asked him, “Why do your disciples disobey our age-old tradition?  For they ignore our tradition of ceremonial hand washing before they eat.”  Jesus replied, “And why do you, by your traditions, violate the direct commandments of God?  For instance, God says, ‘Honor your father and mother,’ and ‘Anyone who speaks disrespectfully of father or mother must be put to death.’  But you say it is all right for people to say to their parents, ‘Sorry, I can’t help you.  For I have vowed to give to God what I would have given to you.’  In this way, you say they don’t need to honor their parents.  And so you cancel the word of God for the sake of your own tradition.  You hypocrites!  Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you, for he wrote, ‘These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me.  Their worship is a farce, for they teach man-made ideas as commands from God.’”  Matthew 15:1-9(NLT)
The Pharisees were not above pushing the envelope where truth was involved, so long as their selfishness passed the test of the greater good.  But in this encounter with Jesus the arrogant, nit-picking Pharisees bit off a little more than they could chew.  They tried to take Jesus to task because the disciples skipped a ceremonial bit of handwashing tradition.  Jesus countered with his own question about why the Pharisees were in the habit of ignoring the needs of poor, aging parents.  The religious teachers were carping about physical cleanliness at the table; Jesus told them to wash their hearts!
The issue (of course) is taking our comfort zone of man-made traditions and placing them ahead of the spirit of God’s way and will.  The Pharisees were masters at this.  Jesus simply told them they were being hypocrites, claiming faithful stewardship of promised gifts to God, just so they could rationalize their own greed.  As Pharisees they were charged with teaching God’s ways; instead they were using religious-sounding traditions to promote their own wealth.  They dishonored their parents, and God did not take that lightly.
A member of the governing board of a church convinced the board to ask the pastor to resign.  They had become bored with the pastor’s sermons.  The pastor responded to the board at the next meeting that God had called him to this church, and he did not sense his work was yet finished, so he would not be resigning.  The board member quickly replied:  Well, God may have brought you here, but we’re getting shed of you! 
Some stuff that is said sounds good; not everything holds up on close examination.  Sometimes church leaders, pastors, board chairs, committees and members say things that may express what the majority of a group thinks, but that does not always mean they’ve found God’s will.  Sometimes they’ve only found a way to rationalize a decision that allows them to remain outside of God’s will, while still keeping the appearance that they’re spiritual.  The real motive, like the Pharisees, is to serve their own greed or control issues.  You can do that if you’re willing to parade lies as truth.  But there is a cost to doing it; the contention between the governing board and pastor of that church was 30 years ago, and the building in which that church met is still standing today, but it is used for a community center now.

For You Today

It’s a good thing to examine what we do because of our traditions; while we’re thinking about this it would be a good time to take a hard look at our motives and decide on which hills it is worthwhile to die. 
You chew on that as you hit the Rocky Road…have a blessed day!
Go to VIDEO

[1] Title Image: Courtesy of Pixabay.com

Monday, August 7, 2017

Righteous or Boastful?

Monday, August 7, 2017
O Lord, hear my plea for justice.  Listen to my cry for help.  Pay attention to my prayer, for it comes from honest lips.  Declare me innocent, for you see those who do right.  You have tested my thoughts and examined my heart in the night.  You have scrutinized me and found nothing wrong.  I am determined not to sin in what I say.  I have followed your commands, which keep me from following cruel and evil people.  My steps have stayed on your path; I have not wavered from following you.
Because I am righteous, I will see you.  When I awake, I will see you face to face and be satisfied.  Psalm 17:1-5, 15(NLT)
King David – did he have too high an opinion of himself, or was he just being forgetful?  This prayer for God’s help almost begs the question whether David was ordering God around.  In the space of a few sentences David calls himself honest, innocent, obedient, and righteous, as opposed to being like the cruel and evil people who oppress others. 
It is difficult to separate this attitude from that of the New Testament image Jesus paints of a Pharisee going to pray in the Temple.  A despised tax collector stood nearby:
The Pharisee stood by himself and prayed this prayer:  ‘I thank you, God, that I am not like other people—cheaters, sinners, adulterers.  I’m certainly not like that tax collector!  I fast twice a week, and I give you a tenth of my income.’  Luke 18:11-12(NLT)
If this Psalm was written while David was being hounded by King Saul, who has gone off the deep end in paranoiac fear that David wants his throne, we can almost forgive David’s wailing; he was trying to serve the king…and his thanks is a death sentence?
David is somewhat naïve at best, and short-sighted about his own (or any human’s) character; who – as Jesus asked – is without sin?
But lurking in the background of the Psalmist’s prayer is an unseen New Testament hope of resurrection.  Notice once again the last phrase:
Because I am righteous, I will see you.  When I awake, I will see you face to face and be satisfied.  Psalm 17:1-5, 15(NLT)
In the post-crucifixion/resurrection sense, righteousness is imputed, or given by God to those who trust in Christ’s righteousness; it is not an earned or deserved achievement.  No human being can pile up enough goodness to be righteous in God’s eyes. 
Yet David claims righteousness…and eagerly looks forward to seeing God face to face.  In this sense, David was way ahead of his time in theological understanding!  What he was claiming was not self-righteousness, but the promise of God to cleanse him from the penalties of all his unrighteousness.
And that makes all the difference!

For You Today

The difference between those sinners who are forgiven, and those who have never trusted Christ for forgiveness and salvation, is that forward-look, that eagerness to see God face to face. 
The forgiven are fearless; the unforgiven, not so much!       
You chew on that as you hit the Rocky Road…have a blessed day!
NOTES

[i] Title Image: By Jastrow (Own work (own picture)) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Thursday, July 28, 2016

The Tempter Arrives

Thursday, July 28, 2016
The temptations in your life are no different from what others experience. And God is faithful. He will not allow the temptation to be more than you can stand. When you are tempted, he will show you a way out so that you can endure.  
1 Corinthians 10:13(NLT)
C.S. Lewis may arguably be the 20th century’s greatest defender of the faith.  His works often make complex theological doctrines somewhat clearer.  In The Screwtape Letters Lewis describes the fight we humans face, and the ways the enemy attempts to trip us up.  He tells the story through the eyes of “Screwtape” (a senior demon), who is mentoring his somewhat less-able nephew, "Wormwood”. 

Senior demon, Screwtape, referring to God as the enemy reveals Hell’s intentions for human marriage:  

The Enemy’s demand on humans takes the form of a dilemma; either complete abstinence or unmitigated monogamy.  Ever since our Father’s first great victory, we have rendered the former very difficult to them.  The latter, for the last few centuries, we have been closing up as a way of escape.  We have done this through the poets and novelists by persuading the humans that a curious, and usually shortlived, experience which they call ‘being in love’ is the only respectable ground for marriage; that marriage can, and ought to, render this excitement permanent; and that a marriage which does not do so is no longer binding.

This idea is our parody of an idea that came from the Enemy.  The whole philosophy of Hell rests on recognition of the axiom that one thing is not another thing, and, specially, that one self is not another self.  My good is my good and your good is yours.  What one gains another loses.  Even an inanimate object is what it is by excluding all other objects from the space it occupies; if it expands, it does so by thrusting other objects aside or by absorbing them.  A self does the same.  With beasts the absorption takes the form of eating; for us, it means the sucking of will and freedom out of a weaker self into a stronger.  ‘To be’ means ‘to be in competition’.[ii]

If C.S. Lewis is right, this explains much about how our culture arrived at the idea that the sexual aberrations of fornication, homosexuality, polygamy, adultery and a host of other perversions of God’s will are not only acceptable, but liberating.  If Lewis has nailed it with Screwtape’s explanation of the “enemy’s” plan, these wanderings-away from God’s will are not only not liberating, they are downright enslaving.

In short, we are choking ourselves to death on forbidden fruit!

For You Today

The pictures today’s culture paint of sexual liberation are as appealing as the fruit Eve determined she just had to have.  The problem is that it all appeals to our lower nature, and not that for which we are created.

Don’t let the tempter suck the life out of your free will; that free will is a gift placed within you by God to live a life of true freedom, purity, and grace; it’s a life of obedience to God’s will and God’s Word!

You chew on that as you hit the Rocky Road today…have a blessed day!

Go to VIDEO


NOTES
[i] Title Image: By Internet Archive Book Images [No restrictions], via Wikimedia Commons
[ii] From The Screwtape Letters Compiled in A Year with C.S. Lewis The Screwtape Letters. Copyright © 1942, C. S. Lewis Pte. Ltd. Copyright restored © 1996 C. S. Lewis Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved. Used with permission of HarperCollins Publishers. A Year With C.S. Lewis: Daily Readings from His Classic Works. Copyright © 2003 by C. S. Lewis Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved. Used with permission of HarperCollins Publishers.